Jul 072014
 

In an important win for LGBT families, the New Hampshire Supreme Court ruled on July 2, 2014 that Susan B. is a legal parent to the daughter she brought into the world with her now ex-partner, Melissa D.  Citing the premise that “children do best when both parents have a stable and meaningful involvement in their lives,” the Court provided twelve-year-old Madelyn B. with the opportunity to be reunited with a parent she’s known her whole life but hasn’t seen in over one year.  The Court’s decision can be found here.

Susan B. was represented by Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders (“GLAD”) in the case.  The NHCLU is proud to have submitted, along with Lambda Legal and other organizations, an amicus brief to the New Hampshire Supreme Court in support of Susan B.’s appeal.

Susan B. is a non-birth mother whose female ex-partner, Melissa D., has kept her from seeing their twelve-year-old daughter, Madelyn B.  Melissa D. is the biological mother of the child, and Susan B. and Melissa D. raised Madelyn B. together from her birth in 2002 until age six, and then co-parented her for over five years after they split up.  Melissa B. was conceived through donor insemination – a form of “assisted reproductive technology.”  At the time of Melissa B.’s birth, the couple could not marry in New Hampshire – which would have established Susan B.’s legal parentage.  As a result, a guardianship arrangement was the only way to establish Susan B.’s legal relationship with their daughter.  Earlier in 2013, Melissa D. terminated that guardianship arrangement in family court, cutting off contact between them, and began proceedings for her new husband to adopt Madelyn B.

Susan B. has done everything she legally can to see her daughter again – including filing a petition to establish her parental rights under RSA 168-B:3 on the basis that Susan B. has and continues to openly hold out Madelyn B. as her child.  However, New Hampshire’s parentage statute, RSA 168-B:3, is not gender neutral on its face; instead, the statute applies only to a father who is seeking to establish parentage, not a mother.  Construing RSA 168-B:3 to apply only to fathers, and not to mothers, treats a child of same-sex parents differently from a child of different-sex parents, and treats a mother who parents with another woman differently from a father.

In reversing the family court, the New Hampshire Supreme Court agreed that RSA 168-B:3 should be interpreted in a gender neutral fashion.  In so holding, the Court recognized a critical fact: Madelyn B. has two parents, regardless of what their gender, sexual orientation, or marital status is.

 July 7, 2014  Tagged with: