On September 25, 2018, in the first lawsuit filed by the ACLU of New Hampshire’s new Immigrants’ Rights Project, the ACLU-NH sued the Exeter Police Department over its unlawful immigration enforcement practices. This case was filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire. The national ACLU Immigrants’ Rights Project and immigration attorney Ronald Abramson are co-counsel on the case.
As courts have repeatedly held, state and local law enforcement officers do not have the legal authority to stop, detain, search, or arrest any individual based solely on the officers’ suspicion that the individual is an undocumented immigrant. Indeed, when local law enforcement detain and arrest individuals simply because they are undocumented, it undermines public safety. Communities are less safe when immigrants are afraid to cooperate with local law enforcement or to report when they themselves are victims of crime because they fear being incarcerated, separated from their children, and deported.
The facts of this case are particularly egregious. On August 10, 2018, Bashar Awawdeh helped the Exeter Police Department with its investigation of an alleged simple assault by providing translation services that enabled the Department to question—and ultimately arrest—a suspect. The Department then unlawfully detained, seized, and arrested Awawdeh on suspicion that he was in the United States without documentation. Awawdeh was held for approximately 90 minutes until an ICE agent arrived at the scene. After ICE took Awawdeh into custody, he was jailed as an immigration detainee, away from his family, for 26 days until he was released on bond with the help of the ACLU-NH. Prior to this presidential administration, Mr. Awawdeh would not have been detained in jail.
Unfortunately, many local police departments in New Hampshire—including Exeter, Salem, and Danbury—routinely assume the role of immigration enforcement by engaging in the unlawful detention of immigrants. This practice is deeply harmful to public safety.
In June 2019, this case settled for $39,175.
