The First Circuit Court has routinely vacated decisions of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) because the BIA failed to apply the required clear error standard of review in reversing Immigration Judges’ factual findings – a failure that allows the BIA to undermine decisions favorable to immigrants issued by Immigration Judges. In its amicus brief filed on June 23, 2022, the ACLU-NH explains that the BIA made this same error once again — this time, in the context of the “nexus” analysis for asylum and withholding of removal claims whereby the immigrant must show that persecution is “on account of” or “because of” one of five statutorily-protected grounds. This case is necessary to help ensure that immigration proceedings remain fair where the procedural rights of the immigrant are fully respected by the BIA and where the BIA does not reverse decisions favorable to immigrants without due cause.
Ixcuna v. Garland
Attorney(s)
Gilles Bissonnette, ACLU-NH Legal Director, and SangYeob Kim, ACLU-NH Staff Attorney
Date filed
June 23, 2022
Court
First Circuit Court of Appeals
Status
Pending
Case number
21-2014
Related Issues
Documents
Related content
NH immigration advocates denounce leaked plans to use FCI Berlin...
February 24, 2025Federal Court Blocks Trump Birthright Citizenship Executive Order
February 10, 2025ACLU-NH Sends Letter to Acting U.S. Attorney Blasting Trump...
January 30, 2025New Hampshire Indonesian Community Support, et al. v. Donald J....
January 20, 2025Immigrants’ Rights Advocates Sue Trump Administration Over...
January 20, 2025ACLU-NH Statement on 2024 Election Results
November 6, 2024ACLU-NH questions state spending on Northern Border after data...
August 1, 2024